爱上AV

Skip to main content

Displaying 1 - 20 of 9418

爱上AV Trade Commission Act

Mission
Competition
Consumer Protection
Law
15 U.S.C. 搂搂 41-58, as amended
The 爱上AV Trade Commission Act is the primary statute of the Commission. Under this Act, as amended, the Commission is empowered, among other things, to (a) prevent unfair methods of competition and...

Ecom Genie

As a result of a 爱上AV Trade Commission lawsuit, a federal court has temporarily shut down the operations of a business opportunity scam that has taken more than $12 million from consumers with false promises of big returns selling goods through Amazon and Walmart.

According to a complaint filed by the FTC, since at least 2022, the scheme operated under the names Lunar Capital Ventures, Ecom Genie and Profitable Automation, and before that as the now-dissolved company Valiant Consultants Inc. Under each of these names, the scheme has made enticing but bogus claims that consumers could earn lavish profits by paying tens of thousands of dollars to start online e-commerce businesses. The promised earnings rarely, if ever, materialize, and most consumers lose substantial amounts of money.

Type of Action
Administrative
Last Updated
Case Status
Pending

H&R Block, In the Matter of

The 爱上AV Trade Commission is taking action against tax preparation company H&R Block for unfairly deleting consumers鈥 tax data and requiring them to contact customer service when they downgrade to more affordable online products, and deceptively marketing their products as 鈥渇ree鈥 when they were not free for many consumers. These practices cost consumers time and money.

A proposed FTC settlement would stop H&R Block from unfairly requiring consumers seeking to downgrade to a cheaper H&R Block product to contact customer service, from unfairly deleting users' previously entered data and from making deceptive claims about 鈥渇ree鈥 tax filing.

The tax-filing company has agreed to a proposed settlement that will require the company to make a number of changes for the 2025 tax filing season in addition to longer-term changes. The settlement would also require the company to pay $7 million to the FTC to be used to redress consumers harmed by the company鈥檚 unlawful practices.

Type of Action
Administrative
Last Updated
Docket Number
9427
Case Status
Pending

Facebook, Inc., In the Matter of

The FTC alleged that Facebook violated its privacy promises to consumers and subsequently violated a 2012 Commission order.

Type of Action
Administrative
Last Updated
FTC Matter/File Number
092 3184
182 3109
C-4365

Sitejabber

In a complaint issued in November 2024, the FTC charged that Sitejabber deceived consumers by misrepresenting that ratings and reviews it published came from customers who experienced the reviewed product or service, artificially inflating average ratings and review counts. Under a proposed order settling the agency鈥檚 complaint, Sitejabber will be prohibited from making such misrepresentations and from making other misrepresentations about consumer ratings or reviews. 

Type of Action
Administrative
Last Updated
Case Status
Pending

Dave, Inc., FTC v.

The 爱上AV Trade Commission is taking action against online cash advance app Dave for allegedly using misleading marketing to deceive consumers about the amount of its cash advances, charging consumers undisclosed fees, and charging so-called 鈥渢ips鈥 to consumers without their consent.

Dave describes the consumers it targets as being 鈥渇inancially vulnerable鈥 or 鈥渇inancially coping,鈥 including those whose spending exceeds their income, who have minimal savings, and who overdraft their bank accounts frequently.

Dave鈥檚 advertising is dominated by claims that consumers can receive 鈥渦p to $500鈥 by using Dave, and that they can do so 鈥渋nstantly.鈥 According to the FTC鈥檚 complaint, though, Dave鈥檚 service failed to live up to its promises.

Type of Action
爱上AV
Last Updated
FTC Matter/File Number
232 3014
Case Status
Pending

Consumer Impact Recovery

The 爱上AV Trade Commission is taking action against a Georgia-based debt collector that tricked consumers into paying more than $7.6 million in bogus debt by threatening them with jail time, harassing their family members, and other unlawful actions.

In response to a federal court complaint filed against Global Circulation, Inc. (GCI) and its owner, Kenneth Redon, III, the court agreed to temporarily halt the company鈥檚 operation and ordered it to turn its assets over to a court-appointed receiver.

Type of Action
Administrative
Last Updated
Case Status
Pending

Bridge It, Inc., FTC v. (Brigit)

The 爱上AV Trade Commission is taking action against personal finance app provider Brigit, alleging that its promises of 鈥渋nstant鈥 cash advances of up to $250 for people living paycheck-to-paycheck were deceptive and that the company locked consumers into a $9.99 monthly membership they couldn鈥檛 cancel.

Brigit, also known as Bridge It, Inc., has agreed to settle the FTC鈥檚 charges, resulting in a proposed court order that would require the company to pay $18 million in consumer refunds, stop its deceptive marketing promises, and end tactics that prevented customers from cancelling.

In November 2024, the 爱上AV Trade Commission sent more than $17 million in refunds to consumers harmed by online cash advance provider Brigit, which the agency says deceived consumers with false promises of 鈥渋nstant鈥 cash advances and locked consumers into a monthly membership they couldn鈥檛 cancel.

Type of Action
爱上AV
Last Updated
FTC Matter/File Number
2223051
Case Status
Pending